Tuesday, November 28, 2023

MENU

A costly conundrum: San Francisco’s Candlestick homeless RV encampment

The costly conundrum

Amidst the towering edifices and iconic landscapes of San Francisco, a dichotomy of existence is laid bare at the Candlestick homeless RV encampment. San Francisco, like most large cities in the West, grapples with a growing homelessness crisis. Near the site of the former Candlestick Park baseball stadium, the city has attempted a temporary solution in the form of RV encampments.

At Candlestick Point, an area echoing with the roars of bygone sporting events now resonates with the muted tones of despondency and perhaps some hope for those who at least have shelter, however temporary. The city’s officials have sanctioned the existence of this RV park as a refuge for the homeless, but the measure comes at a remarkable cost.

The “most expensive homeless response” ever

The San Francisco Chronicle reported the annual cost per parking spot at Candlestick Point at about $140,000. A budget analysis prepared for the San Francisco Board of Supervisors noted that the initiative is “by far the most expensive homeless response intervention” in San Francisco.

The Board of Supervisors Homelessness and Behavioral Health Select Committee unanimously recommended in September that San Francisco extend the program for another two years. If approved, the city would spend an additional $12.2 million to continue funding the site. The city established a safe parking site at Candlestick Point in January 2022, with city officials saying the area could hold 155 recreational vehicles for homeless individuals, according to the Chronicle report. As of this year, however, only 35 RVs are on the lot due to a lack of electricity. A bureaucratic foul-up between the city and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) resulted in the insufficiency of electric power capacity at the RV park.

The temporary abode, sanctioned by city officials, highlights the stark juxtaposition of the immense wealth of the area and the dire poverty existing in the corridor that includes wealthy enclaves such as Burlingame and Palo Alto to the south of the city. Each RV spot, a sanctuary to those without a home, is also a reminder of a city struggling to reconcile its identity as a hub of innovation and enterprise with pervasive and growing poverty and homelessness.

The U.K. Daily Mail exposes the Candlestick Point crisis with a look into the lives affected, the city’s response, and the societal implications of a metropolis with an astronomical cost of living, yet harboring a growing homeless populace.

The Candlestick encampment represents a larger issue

The Candlestick encampment, while offering shelter, is emblematic of a larger issue. It epitomizes the city’s struggle to address homelessness while juggling fiscal constraints, public opinion, and the innate human obligation to extend compassion to the less fortunate.

Is this encampment a solution or a spotlight on the intricate problem of homelessness exacerbated by the city’s soaring living costs? It is noteworthy that the average cost of an apartment has reached nearly $4,000 per month in the San Francisco–San Jose area.

The RVs at Candlestick, thus, are not mere vehicles of shelter but symbols of a city at the crossroads of identity, humanity, and economic reality. Every dollar spent by the city in their maintenance, every critique launched at their existence, and every life sheltered within their confines adds a complex layer to the narrative of a city grappling with its own reflections of wealth and want.

As San Francisco oscillates between its iconic status as a global city and the stark realities laid bare at Candlestick, one may ask if an equilibrium between economic prosperity and social responsibility can ever be attained. The RV encampment stands as a symbol of this tumultuous dialogue, a dialogue that transcends city officials, critics, and the silent, often invisible inhabitants of these temporary dwellings.

##RVT1125b

Randall Brink
Randall Brink
Randall Brink is an author hailing from Idaho. He has written many fiction and non-fiction books, including the critically acclaimed Lost Star: The Search for Amelia Earhart. He is the screenwriter for the new Grizzly Adams television series and the feature film Goldfield. Randall Brink has a diverse background not only as a book author, Hollywood screenwriter and script doctor, but also as an airline captain, chief executive, and Alaska bush pilot.


Advertising

Comments

4.2 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe to comments
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Uncle Swags (@guest_256327)
1 month ago

The wrong people are in charge out there. The results have more than proved that out. Impose good order and discipline on these people and make up for the lack of parenting and schooling they received if there is any hope for them becoming productive members of society.

D. Noar (@guest_256090)
1 month ago

Not “homeless”, they’re addicts.
The west coast doesn’t have a housing problem, we have an addiction crisis. Until we treat this for what it is, addicts from all over the country will migrate here.

Neal Davis (@guest_256054)
1 month ago

Electricity aside, I wonder how safe the Candlestick area is. In particular, I wonder what caused the “unusually high” incidence of cancer among former Sam Francisco 49er football players of the 1950s and 1960s who played (and practiced?) there, and whether it still endangers the lives of those there now? I wonder, too, if the reputation those untimely deaths created is affecting the willingness of the homeless with RVs to locate there? Lastly, I wonder if the reputation of Candlestick is an urban myth?

Neal Davis (@guest_256136)
1 month ago
Reply to  Neal Davis

Had it wrong. Was Kezar Stadium that was thought to have a connection to an unusually large number of San Francisco 49er deaths from cancer, not Candlestick Park. So, nevermind. 🙁

Admin
Diane McGovern
1 month ago
Reply to  Neal Davis

Thanks for the update, Neal. Still very interesting information. I hadn’t heard of that before. Have a great day. 😀 –Diane

WAN2 SKI (@guest_255975)
1 month ago

From the article:

“The San Francisco Chronicle reported the annual cost per parking spot at Candlestick Point at about $140,000.”

So, I’m confused. If the annual cost per parking spot is $140,000, or $11,666.67/month, and an average SF apartment, according to the article, is $4000, why not save the taxpayers $7,666.67 equivalent for each parking space, PER MONTH and move these folks into these $4000/month apartments instead? I’m no economist, but that’s hard to miss.

With this type of fiscal imprudence, it’s little wonder these cities struggle. Where’s

Mikal H (@guest_255987)
1 month ago
Reply to  WAN2 SKI

Exceptionally well stated. They wouldn’t even have to use “average” apartments…put them in $3000/month apartments and save $104,000 per unit per year?

I am guessing there is probably a major shortage of apartments, but the concept is valid.

I used to be in the bay area for business frequently a couple decades ago and even then tiny condos were $850,000. I always wondered how anyone could afford to live there.

Dennis G. (@guest_255955)
1 month ago

Is questionable to think that each parking spot (per the article) cost $140K a year. Multiply that by the 155 spots, equaling to $21.7 million dollars. Would love SF to explain their numbers. Perhaps a follow up interview?

rvgrandma (@guest_255942)
1 month ago

This would be the perfect opportunity for ‘green’ energy to high light their system. How about set up a solar farm in the park to provide electricity for the homeless? Perfect example to show how solar is the answer to ever need for electricity. Or maybe wind mills. This could be used in how the encampments governments are setting up. Then any excess electricity can be sold back to the power companies. Of course we know it would not work. Nomads that live in vans and RVs are finding there is not always enough sun, even in AZ, to give them the amount they need.

Bill Byerly (@guest_255899)
1 month ago

Another great, well written report Randall. Keep them coming!

MattD (@guest_255895)
1 month ago

I think we’re all becoming a bit jaded over California and all its problems, and for good reason. I certainly am.

Drew (@guest_255883)
1 month ago

Very disappointing. This would have never taken place many years ago.- The result of social degradation which can’t be reversed.

Cancelproof (@guest_255881)
1 month ago

This is the clearest, most unbiased article I have read on this subject, here or anywhere. True journalism that dealt with our need for compassion on both sides. Not just for the RV dwellers but for the taxpayer, and the wealthy neighbors in the 20 million dollar homes, whose rights are being trampled as well.

Straight down the middle journalism that didn’t mug for aggreement through coercive guilt techniques, only for the homeless RV dwellers. It’s a big problem that doesn’t seem to have a “big government” solution yet, maybe another trillion for the war on drugs or poverty turns the corner, but I doubt it.

Admin
Diane McGovern
1 month ago
Reply to  Cancelproof

Thank you for your comments, Cancel. When I proofed Randall’s post yesterday, I immediately sent him an email telling him I would award him a Pulitzer Prize for it if I could.🏆 Have a great day! (Mid-80s here today. This is mid-October? In Seattle?! Rain back Monday, however.) 😀 –Diane

Cancelproof (@guest_255909)
1 month ago
Reply to  Diane McGovern

A lovely day in in S.NV. as well.
🌴🌵🌞

Admin
Diane McGovern
1 month ago
Reply to  Cancelproof

👍😎 Heading to the track to work on my tan😉 before rain and 50s return to Seattle on Monday. –Diane

Bill Byerly (@guest_255900)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cancelproof

I couldn’t have said it better Cancel, thanks.

Tommy Molnar (@guest_255870)
1 month ago

A bureaucratic foul-up between the city and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) resulted in the insufficiency of electric power capacity at the RV park.”

So, the power companies can gin up enough power (mega-mega-megawatts) for trucking companies to recharge their trucks but can’t seem to find the power to supply some 30 amp power poles for this homeless encampment. This pretty much sums it up.

WayneG (@guest_255865)
1 month ago

What I gathered from the article is an apartment is 1/3 of the cost of the RV park solution. Why an RV? Build affordable housing.

Lonewolf (@guest_255860)
1 month ago

No pity from me, San Fran and other places such as Portland and Seattle reap what they sow.

Cheryl (@guest_255889)
1 month ago
Reply to  Lonewolf

It is not only the west coast. We have seen it in St Lewis, Houston, Kansas City, and all big cities. The money just isn’t trickling down anywhere.

Cancelproof (@guest_255921)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheryl

I thought we were doing the “bottom up and middle out” failed idea again. Seems we should get back to trickle down ASAP, IMHO.

Gary W. (@guest_255937)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheryl

Still looking for the St Lewis…..

Cancelproof (@guest_255959)
1 month ago
Reply to  Gary W.

Bit east of Cansas.

Elliot (@guest_255982)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cancelproof

“Krakatoa East of Java” 🤣

Thomas D (@guest_255859)
1 month ago

Randal must be an English major
Lots of big words for an average Joe

Carlos (@guest_255856)
1 month ago

One of the problems there is that they don’t take real action and “enable” all kinds of negative social behavior with no consequences.

Cheryl (@guest_255894)
1 month ago
Reply to  Carlos

You are making assumptions of “negative social behavior”. Just because a person can’t afford a home does not mean anything except that they are poor. We have seen it in every big city we have been in. What “real action” are you suggesting? Every big city in the country needs to know.

Primo Rudy's Roadhouse (@guest_255840)
1 month ago

Homeless encampments, encampments,whether in tents or RV’s is a concern for many communities. We also have a flood on immigrants coming in. Our great nation has a lot of social problems which will escalate. Wish I had the answer

Craig Seitz (@guest_255835)
1 month ago

“Bureaucratic foulup” is the perfect description for Frisco.

Mike Willoughby (@guest_255827)
1 month ago

To me this is a social topic, not an RVing topic.

Dan (@guest_255829)
1 month ago

I agree. Just because some of the homeless are using RV’s for shelter does not make it worth more than a brief comment.

Susan (@guest_255863)
1 month ago
Reply to  Dan

I agree, this is not an RV topic. And by reading this, what exactly are we supposed to do about San Francisco? I live 5 states away. There is no way I’m going to send money to CA. That state has collected and squandered enough of my money the 56 years I lived there.

Cheryl (@guest_255896)
1 month ago
Reply to  Susan

What about all the other big cities? St Lewis? Kansas City, Houston, etc. Are you going to avoid them all?

Gary W. (@guest_255936)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheryl

Where is St. Lewis?

Cancelproof (@guest_255960)
1 month ago
Reply to  Gary W.

South of Mini-appleus.

Mikal H (@guest_255989)
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheryl

YES.

Sign up for the

RVtravel Newsletter

Sign up and receive 3 FREE RV Checklists: Set-Up, Take-Down and Packing List.

FREE