RV industry cautions against undue budget cuts



    Screen Shot 2016-04-22 at 8.34.46 AM(March 21, 2017) — In response to the Trump administration’s release last week of a blueprint for its fiscal year 2018 budget — entitled “America First, a Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again” — the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA) has issued a press release cautioning against undue budget cuts, especially with regard to the Department of Interior.

    Offsetting a $52 billion hike in defense spending in the current federal budget proposal, RVIA points out, is a 21% decrease in funding for the Department of Agriculture, a 12% paring of funding for the Department of the Interior (DOI) and a 16% cut to the Army Corps of Engineers.

    The budget proposal, in effect, cuts $1.5 billion from the Department of Interior, including the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

    The funding cuts, according to the new administration, are ostensibly aimed at reducing unnecessary and duplicative programs and new federal land acquisitions while protecting public lands and increasing investment in deferred maintenance projects. However, RVIA in its release expresses concerns about the DOI’s ability to address a $12 billion maintenance backlog while absorbing a 12% budget cut.

    “Investing in America’s great outdoors is imperative to safeguard the health of the $50 billion RV economy,” stated RVIA President Frank Hugelmeyer in the release. “At a time with a record number of RVs headed into the outdoors, steps should be taken to ensure adequate and safe infrastructure exists for this revenue-driving segment of the federal government. RVIA applauds proposals in the budget blueprint to increase investment in deferred maintenance projects and to leverage taxpayer investments with public and private partnerships. RVIA looks forward to working with Congress and the administration on the final budget to prioritize outdoor recreation, address the maintenance backlog and expand access to federal lands for RVers.”

    The Department of Agriculture (USDA), including the U.S. Forest Service, is facing the largest proposed cut of $4.7 billion, RVIA points out, with the bulk of those cuts targeting food education programs, water and wastewater loan programs and unspecified staff reductions at USDA service center agencies. On the other hand, the budget does fully fund wildland fire preparedness and suppression activities.

    The RVIA represents approximately 400 manufacturers and component suppliers producing 98 percent of all RVs made in the United States, according to the organization.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: If you comment, do not scream, yell or name-call. Keep it constructive and civilized. If not, we’ll zap the comment into distant cyberspace. Thanks.

    SOURCE: RVbusiness.com



    Leave a Comment

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    newest oldest most voted
    Notify of
    Dr. Carlo G. Frazzano

    Many of the comments here fail to recognize that there are services provided by the US government that no private organization will or can provide. Examples are the US Postal Service which must serve rural areas that the private sector finds unprofitable. another is TVA ( Tennessee Valley authority and other Government power generation facilities that no only provide power but flood control. Healthcare is another where the private sector has failed in that the US now has the most expensive healthcare in the world and consumes 17,5 % of GDP compared to other developed nations with superior healthcare outcomes, longer life spans and healthier populations plus cheaper healthcare delivery. There are many more areas as well and you will usually find that where the private sector fails or will not participate, it is the responsibility of the Government to step in to provide the “Greatest good for the greatest number.” Free markets do not exist in practice and when they did 100 years ago, services such as banking, manufacturing and power were cartelized by the oligarchs such as J.P Morgan, Carnegie, Mellon and others that either bought out their competition or engaged in practices to drive out their rivals. Result was anti-trust legislation under the Theo. Roosevelt administration to restrain the capitalists from dominating individual sectors of commerce and setting prices to what the traffic would bear.


    Mostly redundant fed services that the states do most of anyway. Frd govt is bloated and inefficient, i say cut!

    Rusty Austin

    This is no surprise. Republicans have never hid their desire to eliminate the NPS and the EPA and sell off all public lands to the highest bidder. If you voted for them, you voted for that. Own it and be proud of your vote. After all the free market will provide RV parks right? As long as you can afford say $100 a night or so…

    Mark Smith

    I agree that waste and fraud reduction in all the federal government , should be the first place to save money. I’ve always thought that they could hire however many people they need to monitor waste and fraud, therefore creating new jobs, pay there salaries from the money they save, and still save millions of taxpayer dollars in the process.

    Lee Wenk

    The RVIA rails against budget cuts but still cuts their own quality assurance budgets. Granted, we (RVers) need more campgrounds and these cuts may impact that, but we would need even more campgrounds if our rigs spent less time in the repair shop.

    Paul Terry

    My wife and myself worked many years as campground hosts/managers. Most Forest Service etc Campgrounds are now operated by private companies, beyond day to day maintenance much needs to be done to protect the capital assets. With budget cuts I fear this will not happen. With more rvs on the road we may find fewer campgrounds to use.

    Pete D

    In conclusion to my comment above, when a budget cut is announced, rather than finding fraud and waste in the organization, they look for ways to make cuts that impact the taxpayer the most. Thereby, getting headlines for their budget woes. If private business operated this way they would be broke in short order. Come to think of it, so is the country.

    Pete D

    I worked for the government all my life. We had a saying, “Use it or lose it.” It was heard as the fiscal year was coming to a close. In other words, if there is money left in the budget you had better spend it or your budget could be cut next year. That brought about much unnecessary spending. A bureaucracy is a living organism whose objective is to live and grow on taxpayer money.