San Francisco moves to ban RV dwelling homeless from city streets

    10
    7

    San Francisco officials, like those in other cities around the country, continue to struggle to come up with a plan for what to do with homeless RV dwellers living on congested city streets.

    First city officials chased the RVs out of the Sunset and Richmond Districts. Then they were rolled off Potrero Hill and squeezed out from underneath the “Hairball,” a series of interconnecting freeways in the southeast.

    Now, in the latest effort to discourage people who say they have nowhere else to go to sleep and live, Supervisor Ahsha Safai is seeking an oversize vehicle ban for a tiny street tucked behind Alemany Boulevard, a stone’s throw from Cayuga Playground, reports the SF Examiner.

    In a hearing Friday morning a handful of people met to discuss the future of the destitute and homeless. In that hearing room a woman who lives in an RV along De Wolf Street spoke to hearing officers in Spanish — though the officers could not speak or understand Spanish, and no translator was immediately available.


    “Please, I need to explain,” she said in Spanish. “I have a mobile home that’s parked there. I live there, I sleep there. I take care of my (disabled) son and only daughter. Where will I move? I’m (disabled).” She began to sob midway through and in English said, “Please, help me.”

    Within the last two years, the SFMTA Board of Directors, which gives final approval for such street changes, told SFMTA staff it would no longer pass oversize vehicle restrictions because those restrictions aren’t permanent solutions.

    “We weren’t really solving anything,” said SFMTA Board of Directors Chair Cheryl Brinkman, “by putting these block by block restrictions on, we were simply moving the problem of vehicularly housed residents around The City.”

    Those vehicles were shuffled around to new neighbors who then would ask for their own ban. And on, and on, and on.

    On De Wolf Street Friday, a man living in an RV said police had “gotten rid of the folks who use drugs.” He came to live in his RV after he could no longer afford his apartment.

    The MTA Board of Directors is scheduled to vote on vehicle restrictions to De Wolf Street Sept. 18.

    10
    Leave a Reply

    avatar
    8 Comment threads
    2 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    9 Comment authors
    Billy Bob ThortonRoyTinkLeeRoy Recent comment authors

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

      Subscribe  
    newest oldest most voted
    Notify of
    Billy Bob Thorton
    Guest
    Billy Bob Thorton

    Ok, let’s look at this logically people. The history of this country was partly made by hard working immagrants who broke their collective backs, trying to make a better life for their families. That being FACT, let’s fast forward to today. Illegals are rampant, they think they are above the law, by entering our country by other means, than regular ports of entry. Why, because they would be politely told, to request and instructed to file the proper documentation for a green card, and possible citizenship down the road. You know, like the immagrants who landed in places like Ellis… Read more »

    Roy
    Guest
    Roy

    Finally, the Ninth Circuit makes ONE decision that makes sense. Force the cities to do something to address the problem … but billing large corporations is not the answer like the Prop C that is to be on the ballot. Maybe the Ninth Circuit will have the homeless park in front of their courthouse … ??

    Lee
    Guest
    Lee
    Roy
    Guest
    Roy

    If the problem were limited to simply folks who need less expensive ‘housing’ … the issue would not be compounded by an abundance of used hypo-needles, feces in the gutters and on sidewalks. Folks who cannot afford to live in California need to leave. There is no ‘right’ to live in Calif … it just makes a great place where so much is handed out and now cities want to ‘pay’ people a ‘wage’ just for holding their hand out. This is going to go downhill faster and faster.

    Tink
    Guest
    Tink

    Roy, Where do you want them to move to?

    Tink
    Guest
    Tink

    Yes Doug, if she is an illegal immigrant, she is part of the problem, and should leave, instead of beg to be taken care of by a welfare state that she has never contributed to. However, there are countless people living in that area of California that are working, and they can not afford to pay for their house, apartment, and some even, an RV. As a result they are homeless. They work, they earn money, but because of how outrageous the cost of living has been allowed to get there, the middle class and lower can no longer keep… Read more »

    Gene Bjerke
    Guest
    Gene Bjerke

    The problem in the Bay area is that housing is so expensive that even people who have jobs may not be able to afford a place to live. My son in Berkeley lived and had his business in a building for over 20 years. When the landlord decided that he wanted the building for something else, The only thing he could afford to do was move his workshop into a shipping container and go live with his girl friend. Not everyone living on the street is a lazy bum.

    Patrick Granahan
    Guest
    Patrick Granahan

    They are once again missing the real point here.
    These folks are not homeless as they currently are living in a RV with kitchen, bath, dining table and sleeping areas.
    The real problem is they lack money….perhaps they could get a job and then move their RVs to a campground or RV Park on a seasonal long term site ( which costa money you get from employment )….GET A JOB !…..problem solved.

    Doug
    Guest
    Doug

    If the woman in the article is an “undocumented immigrant”, tell her to park her RV in her own country.

    Tommy Molnar
    Guest
    Tommy Molnar

    Rough as that sounds, Doug, I agree. Too many illegal aliens causing too many problems. But I’m guessing the problem is mostly just indigents who ARE legal.