Home Blog Page 2109

Your input wanted: Bring Grizzly Bears to the Cascades?

0

 

SEDRO WOOLLEY, Wash, Jan. 12, 2017 — The National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) are inviting the public to participate in a series of informational open houses regarding the proposed alternatives for the restoration of grizzly bears to the North Cascades ecosystem. The alternatives are described in the draft Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (draft EIS), released by the two agencies. The meetings are one part of the public’s opportunity to comment on the draft EIS.

The purpose of the EIS is to determine what actions, if any, should be taken to restore the grizzly bear to the North Cascades Ecosystem. Although there are six populations of grizzly bears in North America, the last-known sighting of grizzlies in the United States portion of the North Cascades Ecosystem is 1996. The goal of the public comment period is to gather comments regarding the draft EIS; public comments received on the draft EIS will be evaluated and considered in the identification of the preferred alternative, which will be published in the Final EIS. The full draft EIS is available at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/grizzlydeis.

The alternatives analyzed in this draft EIS include a “no-action” alternative, plus three action alternatives that would seek to restore a reproducing population of approximately 200 bears through the capture and release of grizzly bears into the North Cascades Ecosystem. The alternatives were developed by a planning team with input from the public, local, state and federal agencies, and the scientific community.

In addition to the open houses, the public also is invited to submit written comments at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/grizzlydeis. Comments may also be submitted through March 14, 2017 via regular mail or hand delivery at: Superintendent’s Office, North Cascades National Park Service Complex, 810 State Route 20, Sedro Woolley, WA 98284

In order to maximize opportunities for public input, webinars are scheduled for Tuesday, February 14 from 11 a.m.-1 p.m. Pacific Time and Sunday, February 26 from 5 p.m.-7 p.m. Pacific Time. For more information about the open houses and to register for the webinars, visit: https://parkplanning.nps.gov/grizzlydeis and click on the “Meetings” link.

The public open houses will be held from 6-8 p.m. at the following locations:

  • Cle Elum – February 13 at the Putnam Centennial Center
  • Cashmere – February 14 at the Riverside Center
  • Winthrop – February 15 at the Red Barn
  • Omak – February 16 at the Annex Facility at Okanogan County Fairgrounds
  • Bellingham – February 21 at the Bellingham Technical College
  • Darrington – February 22 at the Darrington Community Center
  • Sultan – February 23 at the Sultan High School
  • Renton – February 24 at the Renton Community Center

The grizzly bear was listed as a threatened species in the contiguous United States in 1975. The species was listed as endangered by the state of Washington in 1980.

The North Cascades Ecosystem encompasses 9,800 square miles in the United States and another 3,800 square miles in British Columbia, Canada. The United States portion of the ecosystem includes North Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, and Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest.

The U.S. Forest Service and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife are cooperating agencies on the EIS. Funding for the EIS is provided by the NPS. The U.S. Forest Service, FWS and other cooperating agencies and partners will provide technical support throughout.

For more information on grizzly bear recovery, visit https://bit.ly/NCEgrizzly or www.nps.gov/noca/grizzly.htm.

##RVT776

Wants to boondock but nervous about isolation

12

Here’s a question from a reader of RVtravel.com about boondocking. 

Hi, Bob,
I have always wanted to try boondocking, but my husband is nervous about being out in the “boonies” away from all support when we’ve never tried it and don’t know what to expect. Is there a way to ease into this way of camping without cutting all ties to civilization? —Joyce A.

Yes, Joyce, there is. And it’s not as hard as you might imagine. The core skill for boondocking is learning to camp without hookups found in campgrounds (water, sewer, electricity — and for some, the internet). This requires knowing the limitations of your built-in systems, like how long your house batteries will provide electricity, how many days does it take to fill up your gray and black water tanks, and how many days will your water tank deliver water to your faucets.

The capacities you can learn from your RV manual but the practical information will come from using your RV without any hookups. Look for campgrounds that have no-hookup campsites, but have an available water source and dump station in case your estimates on usage are off. Forest service campgrounds are typically no-hookup yet often have a communal water supply and dump station. Or you could even try a night in a Walmart parking lot and measure how much of your resources you used for that night.

Every night you spend without hookups adds to your knowledge, experience and confidence, enabling you to stretch your days and choice of locations a little further each time you try boondocking.

Read more about boondocking at my blog.
Check out my Kindle eBooks about boondocking at Amazon.

##RVT776 ##RVDT1282

Organizing and safely storing your photos

 

Google Photos book by Chris Guld

by Chris Guld

I count on Google Photos to keep ALL my photos together, in one place with no effort on my part. Once I’ve installed the Google Photos app on my mobile devices, and the Desktop Uploader on my computers, I no longer need to manage my library of photos. No more worries. I know that they are all there, online at photos.google.com in date order. And, if I’m looking for a particular person, place, thing, or event, Google’s search or automatic albums will probably show me what I want to see. I like Google Photos so much, I wrote a book on it! (Available on Amazon.)

Monthly Albums

Google Photos keeps  my entire library of photos – 58,000 of them according to my Google Dashboard – but I want to be able to browse just those best pictures from each month. At the end of the year, I want to be able to see something like the image at right. Most of the work involved here is to select those best pictures and add them to a monthly album.

This is work I do all year long. For example, just yesterday I started my album for January 2017. It’s not something I do on the 1st of each month, it’s something I do when I take my first good picture of the month. With that picture open, I click the 3-dot menu at top right and “Add to Album.” I give the new album a name: 201701 January. Then, throughout the month, I keep adding my best pictures to that “official” monthly album. I may also make albums for special events, but I definitely have an album for each month.

At the end of the year, the work for my monthly albums should already be done, but now is the time to review and add/delete as I see fit.

Monthly Backups to Computer

I trust Google to keep my 58,000 photos safe, but I want to be doubly sure I have copies of my best, monthly pictures. To that end, I download each monthly album from Google Photos to a USB hard drive on my computer. That way, even if I’m not connected to the Internet, I know I have all my best pictures with me offline. Google Photos makes this easy, just open the desired album, click the 3-dot menu at upper right and Download all. This will create a .zip file on your drive – unzip it and you have your pictures.

I actually prefer using Picasa on my computer to perform this task. I open Picasa and use the File menu, Import from Google Photos. Then I can find the album in question and it downloads the pictures, and all captions so I can view them using Picasa – no unzipping required.

Yearly Album and Slideshow

At the end of the year, I have 12 albums with 1-200 photos each. That’s still a lot of pictures to view! I like to see my year at a glance, one album with 2-300 pictures. So, I select my best photos from the monthly albums and create an album named simply 2016. It’s pretty easy to do since I can start with the monthly albums, select the best of the best, click the + in the upper right and add to album – 2016.

YouTube makes it single-click easy to take that album and make a slideshow/movie out of it!

Getting the Year at a Glance Page

If you would like to have a year at a glance page like the one in my image above, I suppose I should tell you how I did that! There is no automatic way to do this – maybe someday Google will give us a shareable year at a glance, but for now it’s a manual process. I use Blogger, and Live Writer. You could use whatever tools you know that can create hyperlinks and images. You could even use Word, or Google Docs to create a document with the links to each month’s albums.

The links to each month are easy. Using Google Photos, open the January album, then click the share button imageand select “Get Link.” Copy that link and then use it to create a hyperlink out of the word January. Repeat for each month:

The thumbnail images are not so easy. I use Windows Snipping tool to grab a small image of the picture I want to represent the month, then paste it into my Blogger file using Live Writer. I’ll be happy to make a video about that if any of you use Blogger and Open Live Writer and  are interested. Leave a comment.

Chris Guld is President and Teacher-in-Chief at GeeksOnTour.com. She has been in computer training and support since 1983 and owned a Computer Training Center called Computer Savvy from 1983-1996. She has been a Fulltime RVer, popular seminar presenter at RV Rallies, and regular contributor to RVTravel.com, for many years.

When I went to the Moon

 

By Chuck Woodbury,
Editor and astronaut
Everyone knows that Neil Armstrong was the first man to step on the Moon. Most of us know Buzz Aldrin was second. But do you know the seventh man to walk on the Moon — a man who even drove on the Moon?

It was me! I was the seventh man on the Moon! I spent two glorious days there. In the photo below I had just finished taking a drive on the Moon Rover (a gutless wonder) over to a rock outcropping. It looked very much like those I’ve seen in Death Valley. I took a picture of it, but I am sad to say I lost it.

Me returning from my drive.

What was it like to look back at Earth from the Moon? You may have wondered that. I can just say it was really great and you should try it.

I have been modest through the years in talking about this achievement, but I think it is probably time you know. I just told my daughter and I’m telling you she was flabbergasted.

If you were to visit my motorhome, you would see this photo, framed, on the wall of my bedroom. On beautiful nights in the desert, when the Moon is full, I sometimes stare at it for an hour, thinking, “I was there.” It makes me feel warm and fuzzy all over. . .

Okay to overnight in an RV at a truck stop?

2

 

Video from the RV Travel Channel. . .
Many RVers routinely stay overnight in truck stops. Some do it only as a last resort when an RV park is not nearby. Is staying in these places okay?

Jim O’Briant of OvernightRVparking.com says that yes, it is okay to stay at some truck stops, which he names. But there are ways to do it and ways not to do it. Learn more about Jim’s website, where he lists thousands of places to stay for free or nearly free in an RV including truck stops.

The RVers Friend directory shown in the video is available at Amazon.com.

##RVT776

Gun-shy about boondocking near Mexico border

 

Dear RV Shrink:rvshrink
This is our first year living in our RV. We are not looking for the next RV resort with a pickleball team; we prefer the wide-open spaces. The problem is one you have talked about before: border safety. We have never camped down near the border on boondock BLM land because of all the stories we’ve heard about problems with illegals. We keep talking about going but then back out. Are we overreacting? Should we just try it? —Gun-shy in Glendale

Dear Gun-shy:
First, stop reading the paper and cancel your satellite contract. Life comes with no guarantees, so I suggest you ease into situations you find uncomfortable. If boondocking and hiking in the desert is something that sounds appealing but makes you nervous, here’s a plan that should work for you.

Spend a week basking in the sun in Organ Pipe National Monument in Arizona. It is only a mile from the border. It has hikes and scenic drives that come so close to the border you can wave at our neighbors to the south.

Go on a few ranger-led hikes and drives. You will learn a lot about the desert and most likely start to feel comfortable about your new surroundings. Don’t let the fact that the visitor center is named after a young ranger that was killed by drug cartel members scare you from enjoying the park and its surroundings.

Once you immerse yourself in the park doing ranger activities, then drive north to Why, Arizona. There you will find three commercial campgrounds and 1,100 acres of free BLM camping. This area will let you ease into the boondocking lifestyle. It’s kind of like breaking in a new pair of boots: It won’t take long and you will feel comfortable with your surroundings. You will enjoy some of Arizona’s warmest weather and view fantastic desert sunsets and sunrises. You will wake up every morning to a chorus of coyotes with often a bass section of burros.

Drive down to the BLM and look around. You may feel comfortable once you notice there are dozens of others scattered around the property. Talk to them or hike with them. You might even have to drink with them. The woman that acts as the host has her own band and will assure you there are few problems you need to be concerned with. There is more border patrol personnel stationed there than cactus in the desert.

Try it, you’ll like it. —Keep Smilin’, Richard Mallery a.k.a. Dr. R.V. Shrink

Can’t get enough of the Shrink? Read his new e-book: Dr. R.V. Shrink: Everything you ever wanted to know about the RV Lifestyle but were afraid to ask or check out his other e-books.


##RVT776

Intellitec Battery Disconnect Relay prevents dead batteries

 

Intellitec Battery Disconnect

By Bob Difley

It is not a pleasant surprise to find dead batteries in your RV after storing it for a few weeks. The phantom discharges will do that, and Ghost Busters are no help. However, you can prevent your batteries from becoming discharged with a switch-controlled battery disconnect.

The Intellitec Battery Disconnect Relay is at the heart of the battery drain protection system. This system provides a simple and safe means of remotely disconnecting the batteries of an RV or boat.

With a touch of a remote switch, the batteries will be completely disconnected, preventing unwanted drain when the RV or boat is put into storage.

You can find the battery disconnect on Amazon.

You can find Bob Difley’s RVing ebooks on Amazon Kindle. Follow on BoondockBobblog.

##bd1-17; ##RVT776

Brighten or dim your RV’s interior lights with 3-way switch

 

 

SalVinCo 3-way LED bulb

By Bob Difley

You can now vary the brightness of your cabin lights with the simple flip of a switch – no dimmer required, a press release from SalVinCo reports. Bee Green LED’s new Three Way G4 bi-pin LED bulbs offer you the option to choose among three levels of lighting from one bulb.

Just by toggling the light off and back on with your wall switch or fixture switch you can adjust the brightness, the release stated. The three-way LED bulbs are available either as a retrofit G4 bi-pin bulb for your existing fixtures, or may be purchased in new fixtures.

Parameters include a 10-30 volt DC operating range (for 12 volt or 24 volt systems), warm white 2900 kelvin color temperature (soft warm white), a beam angle of 120 degrees, and side pin or extra-long 1-inch back pin versions.

Operating at only 2 watts maximum, they offer three lumen settings of 197/129/65 (high setting of 197 lumens is comparable to 12 watts of halogen). Available in either the side pin model Lg4s963ww, or back pin model Lg4b963ww. Diameter is 1.18-inches. Retail price is $23.99.

A slightly larger 1.30-inch diameter back pin model Lg4b15123 offers brighter high and medium intensities at 275/220/55 lumens (high setting of 275 lumens is comparable to a 20-watt halogen). Maximum power is 3 watts.

For more information, visit the SalVinCo website.

You can find Bob Difley’s RVing ebooks on Amazon Kindle. Follow on BoondockBobblog.

##bd1-17; ##RVT776

Information obtained from company press release.

The readers write — Hammer-toss at poor-quality RVs

Edited by Russ and Tiña De Maris

In a hilarious and sad-but-true fashion, a YouTube feature we highlighted showed just how bad things can be for folks buying new RVs. What a nerve that struck with you. Here’s just a SMALL sample of the many responses that came rushing in.

Wayne wonders, “Why is Thor still in business? Maybe they make better ones and the buyers aren’t commenting like on this blog? If there are any happy Thor owners, I’d like to hear those stories,but then I didn’t know any RV maker had a real heart once their product reaches the selling floor. Good luck buyer…”

Another Thor owner, Laurie, writes of her experiences. “Our first attempt to work with the dealer from which the RV was sold ended up in a standoff between my husband and the very belligerent manager there. So we contacted Thor, and got some other dealers we could work with. We contacted a dealer and he reluctantly agreed to take us on. (Not much money for them and LOADS of hassle!!) One trip to the dealer to take pictures and present our list of problems. Then MONTHS of waiting and calling and pestering both the dealer and Thor. Interesting that Thor has a great customer service department – they say all the right things, and haven’t been difficult to reach – but they obviously have NO power and control over getting real decisions made and getting things fixed in a timely manner. The dealer too was pleasant enough, but was understaffed and we continually went to the bottom of their priority list.”

Theresa offers a suggestion to RVers: “Social media is the answer. Years ago, our only resource was to threaten to “write the newspaper.” Now social media allows dissatisfied owners to immediately spread the word and let the whole world know what a piece of crap they’ve purchased! Good luck, Jon, with this pursuit. I think you have a just case for getting ALL of your money refunded. Keep us informed of how both Thor and CW respond after all of this exposure.”

Richard Hughes was succinct: “Typical for Camping World and most RV makers. ‘We have your money, you have your coach and warranty, both are bad, but we are going to ignore you until you go away.’”

We could relate plenty of horror stories. Here’s one from Jeff: “My wife and I purchased a 2014 Hurricane built by Thor from Camping World. Both of these decisions were probably the worst we have ever made when it comes to camping. Like you, we spent three months in Camping World’s shop in Garner, North Carolina, and the items we brought it in for were never fixed. I ended up having to fix some of them myself. The remainder required another six week trip to service and those only got fixed because my wife went in there and lost it in the service department. Long story short, the useless general manager called me a couple of weeks later after I posted a letter on their website. I guess he didn’t like my bluntness. We are now looking to trade away from poor quality Thor to something that won’t rattle apart going down the road.”

Not everyone has completely lost faith in Camping World. Andy writes, “Camping World’s CEO Marcus Lemonis either has his head buried in the sand or his people are keeping the many customer complaints from him. I think he is a very competent and honest person, and he needs to step up. CW is in desperate need of a complete company wide customer care revamp. Let’s see if he can ‘turn around’ his own company as he does with the ones on THE PROFIT!”

Observes Mike, “Latest figures indicate that 80% of the RV industry is owned by three corporations. Their only purpose is to answer to their shareholders, not the consumer. As such, it’s ‘caveat emptor.’ Better off to buy from a company which isn’t publicly traded and who are known for their quality.”

Here’s a suggestion Bill makes when it’s time to shop for a new RV: “I went with a used 2006 Four Winds with a Chevy engine from El Monte Rentals. My theory was that for insurance purposes, they have to keep things maintained and safe for rental customers so when they decide to sell them, at least most things have been fixed. Sure, we had to buy new tires and some minor details had to be fixed, most of which I was able to do. Took it to a mechanic who said it drove great and all looked good. We drove it 8,000 miles our first summer across the country with no problems…engine hardly used any oil and had a great time. We have bought used cars from car rental agencies too and they always seem to be in good shape. With people suing for almost anything, these rental companies have to be on top of maintenance or they will be out of business.”

And as to the amazing logic of some RV dealers? “American traveler” writes: “When we were shopping for our 5th wheel we tried Camping World. The models shown had numerous visual flaws. I asked the salesman if that was wise. He said they fixed that stuff if a customer bought it. I said I thought it might drive people away. It certainly did us!”

You may wonder if anything has happened for Jon Henderson, who posted (and starred in) the original video. After a week or better of the video rattling the heavens of YouTube, here’s Jon’s report: “So far we have not heard from Camping World. We actually sent it to Thor before we released it. They fixed the stairs and the rattling, calling it ‘good will’ as the warranty expired. But [they] didn’t address that the coach was in the shop during four months of the warranty period . They offered us three months of the payments we made while the coach was in the shop, but only if I signed a release saying I would not release the video or talk about Thor negatively on social media. The gentleman I spoke to was very condescending. He talked to me as if I was a child, not someone who just spent $80k on his product. Thor cares very little about their consumers.”

##RVT776 ##RVDT1280

Different model year on chassis versus motorhome

 

By Russ and Tiña De Maris

“Help! Our 2014 Axis motorhome is built on a 2013 chassis. We had both titles and the VIN number was the same for the coach as the chassis. No matter how much we explained to our local DMV office that there was no such thing as a 2013 Axis, they still issued the title to a 2013 Axis. We’re still trying to get this squared away. Does anyone have any suggestions? Is this normal?”

This RVer’s experience isn’t completely unheard of but, no, it shouldn’t really happen. But here’s how it can happen.

In the industry, motorhomes are called “multi-stage” vehicles. Unlike your around-town car, instead of all rolling off a single assembly line in one fluid motion, the chassis is built first, on one assembly line, and typically by a non-RV manufacturer. The RV builder may buy dozens, if not hundreds, of these chassis, then store them until they’re ready to stick the “coach” on top of the chassis.

The outfit that builds the chassis is called an “incomplete vehicle manufacturer,” and they issue a title for the chassis. The RV builder is technically called a “completed vehicle manufacturer.” Federal law dictates that in cases like these, the chassis builder must issue the VIN (Vehicle Identification Number). Included in the VIN is a digit that indicates the year the chassis was built.

The RV builder continues to use this same VIN. They may also have received an MCO document (Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin) from the chassis manufacturer, specific to each individual chassis. When the completed motorhome is shipped to a dealer, the MCO document goes with the rig, BUT the RV manufacturer, as the completed vehicle manufacturer, is to designate on this document the actual model year of the completed motorhome. Here’s the first thing to look at: When buying a new motorhome, ask to see the MCO document before you sign the contract. The MCO document should indicate the model year of the coach, not the chassis, if they’re not the same.

Why is this so important? Well, a batch of chassis manufactured one year may very well not be turned into a completed motor home that same model year. As was the case for the RVer we mentioned in the opening, the completed motorhome should have shown a “newer” model year than the chassis itself. The Federal Trade Commission has ruled that this is not unfair or deceptive that the motorhome and the chassis would have two different years of manufacture. In fact, California, Maryland, Michigan, and Wisconsin are the only states that require dealers to disclose to customers any difference in model years between the completed coach and the underlying chassis.

When a new owner takes his paperwork to the DMV for titling and registration, what should happen is the DMV should title the vehicle with the model year specified by the RV manufacturer. Sadly, it appears that not every DMV employee has “read the fine print in the contract,” or maybe they’re just obstinate. In cases where the DMV insists on titling the rig with the chassis model year, you can get help. Grab your phone and call the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association at 703-620-6003 and ask for the Government Affairs Office. Hopefully your stalemate will be resolved in a hurry with their help.

You, too, can pretend you’re in prison and make your own license plates! Visit Acme.com.  Thanks to Acme for helping us put up the artwork on this story.

 

##RVT776

Airport “insecurity” underscores joy of RVing instead

By Russ and Tiña De Maris

If you need another reason to enjoy traveling by RV, here’s another real-life adventure that underscores the point.

An RVer, who asked to remain unnamed, recently got news that she was a first-time great-grandmother. To see the new “grand,” she’d have to travel from Arizona to Washington state, and the weather seemed to suggest flying would be a better choice. So she packed her bags and headed to the airport.

All was fine until she hit the security checkpoint, whereupon the good folks from TSA announced that since she had recently been equipped with a heart pacemaker, she couldn’t go through the agency medical detector. Did she tell them about the pacemaker (which, according to its manufacturer, can safely make the trip through a metal detector)? Nope – somehow the all-knowing federal government already had the information on file. Figure that one out.

pironimo on flickr.com

So, bypassing the metal detector, the woman was shuffled through the infamous “scanner,” which unlike its predecessors doesn’t use radiation to detect bad stuff, and is more “passenger friendly.” Friendly, that is, until the snooper scope determined that three areas of her body were suspect, and she was then subject to what she described as a pretty rough pat down.

Her luggage wasn’t faring the trip through security much better. After what she felt was a humiliating search, she found her baggage thoroughly unpacked, and certain “verboten” items had been found. A brand new tube of toothpaste was tossed out. And, heaven forbid, she’d also packed a small baggy of Malt-o-Meal in her luggage. After being questioned at length about the offending hot cereal, and it passing an explosives test, she was finally sent off for her plane.

The return trip from Seattle was even worse. In addition to the “no go” through the metal detector, another ride in the scanner, this time the pat-down search was accompanied by a security agent who must have had several cups of “Seattle’s Worst Coffee,” as he shouted abuses at the piqued passenger. This finally got the traveler’s dander up, and when she encountered her torn up luggage, she suggested perhaps security personnel might want to repack her baggage. Not the thing to suggest — this resulted in further humiliating comments from TSA staffers, and firm orders to “Stay right there!” After several minutes of simply standing around, the woman inquired if she could move. Instead of being instructed, the security agent who made the original demand simply stomped off, leaving her standing there. After several more minutes, she took it on herself to move along.

The RVer tells me she will NEVER fly a commercial flight again, and that either she’ll take the RV, or even drive and “motel it,” rather than subject herself to another round in the TSA tumbler.

 

##RVT776

Off, off, dratted sealant!

By Chris Dougherty
Chris Dougherty is a certified RV technician. Here is a letter he received from a reader while he was serving as RVtravel.com’s technical editor.

Dear Chris,
Recently I decided to add some caulking to areas (that I felt needed it) on the exterior of our fiberglass clad trailer to make sure no water could get in. I’ve been told this is a good thing to do. After I did quite a bit along one side, I thought I would check the package to make sure that it goes on white and dries clear. Unfortunately, it does not. I had inadvertently bought white RV caulking. The problem is that our trailer is beige. I needed clear. My question is what is the best way to remove the white caulking so I can replace it with clear? —Astrid

Dear Astrid,
Worry not, a common mistake. Fortunately the same company has a fix for you, as Geocel makes ProflexRV in a clear and beige formulation, among other colors, and can be found on Amazon here.

As for removing the old sealant, I would recommend using a plastic “non-marring” scraper so as not to damage the sidewall of the coach. I use these and they work great!

According to the sealant manufacturer, once cured, solvents will not work on it, so you will need to scrape it off.

##RVT776 ##RVDT1281