Thursday, June 24, 2021
Thursday, June 24, 2021

RV Tire Safety: Speed in relation to the lifespan of ST-type tires

By Roger Marble
I saw this post on an RV Advice forum: “We have ST-type tires. Do we have to run less than 65 mph? We see a lot of RVs passing us.”

The “speed symbol” is actually a relative measure of heat resistance.

The speed number is based on a brand-new tire being able to run for 30 minutes on a perfectly smooth steel drum at a constant speed without coming apart. Any tire running the test is considered scrap after the 30-minute run.

65 mph is the assumed Max operational speed for ST-type tires.

This is part of the calculations used to establish a tire load capacity. While it is unlikely that your tires will come apart as soon as you run 66 mph, it is true that the faster you run, the “faster” you are using up the life of your tires. People running faster than 65 is one of the contributing reasons for ST-type tires to have shorter life than tires on your car or pickup.

I often compare tire speed rating like your engine “Red Line” speed. If your car indicated 4,500 RPM as the Red Line, you can probably run 4,495 RPM for some time without the engine blowing up. BUT I would think you would know this will significantly shorten the life of the engine. It’s the same with tires.

Have a tire question? Sign up for Roger Marble’s new Facebook Group: RV tire news, information and discussion, hosted by RVtravel.com and moderated by Roger. He’ll be happy to help you.

Read more from Roger Marble on his blog at RVtiresafety.net or on RVtravel.com.

 ##RVT1001

Related Articles

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric
1 month ago

Good explanation!

Richard
1 month ago

What’s the hurry? I don’t drive in the open plains of Texas but the more crowded midwest highways so probably never drive over 60 mph. But that gets me there in 108% of the time expended compared with 65 mph and I feel safer doing it.
At my age (82) I am way beyond the need to keep up!

Bill
1 month ago
Reply to  Richard

I Double Down on what Richard says .. if I drive 60 and you drive 65 I’ll only be 5 minutes behind you every hour but have saved some fuel and wear and tear on my rig…and I’m a young 72..

Follow us!

31,714FansLike
26,126FollowersFollow
66,000SubscribersSubscribe