The U.S. Senate just passed its version of a new federal infrastructure bill that calls for $550 billion in additional spending on the nation’s crumbling roads and bridges, as well as a renewed effort to improve the lagging U.S. broadband network. The bill now goes to the U.S. House for their input.
Any RVer who has taken a trip more than 50 miles from home can appreciate the need for some work on the nation’s highways and bridges. Many folks I know have a coffee cup full of nuts, bolts, screws, and washers that they’ve collected over time – all shaken loose from some dark corner of their RV as it rattled across a washboard road or crumbling span over a river.
Setting the politics of the mega-spending bill aside (19 Republican senators crossed the aisle to vote for the bill), it’s important for every American to have a firm understanding of the federal infrastructure plan and its ramification on jobs, local economies and our own RVing lifestyles.
What’s the real total?
The $550 billion in spending approved by the Senate this week is actually additional spending that would be added to previously approved spending. The total is actually $1 trillion in spending on infrastructure.
That number seems almost beyond comprehension, but it isn’t the largest amount ever dedicated to infrastructure, if you look at it as a percentage of Gross National Product (GNP). In those terms, the record goes to spending during the Great Depression in 1933, when 2.96% of the GNP went into infrastructure spending. To hit that mark now, we’d have to be looking at about $4 trillion on new spending over the course of the next decade.
The U.S. currently spends about 0.55% of its GNP on infrastructure, and that’s well below the United Kingdom (0.91%), Japan (0.94%), and way behind China (5.56%). Infrastructure spending is a big reason China has gained the upper hand as an economic world power in recent years.
Since President Eisenhower forked over the funding for the nation’s interstate highway system in the late 1950s, most infrastructure spending has been on the backs of local governments (about 78%). Although local officials certainly have a better feel for local needs, they have been left short of funds over the years. That’s a big reason we find ourselves with a crumbling infrastructure now.
The Biden administration’s plan is to reassert the federal government into public works spending in a big way.
What does the bill include?
Here’s the breakdown:
- $110 billion to repair highways, bridges, and roads. It’s estimated that 173,000 miles of roads are in poor condition. The $40 billion for bridges alone is the largest bridge investment since the interstate highway system was created.
- $39 billion for public transit systems, including zero-emission buses.
- $66 billion for passenger and freight rail lines. That’s a record since Amtrak was founded 50 years ago.
- $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging stations. This is one that is likely to greatly impact campgrounds, as they improve their own infrastructures to handle the expected increase in electric passenger cars, tow vehicles, towing pickup trucks and, eventually, fully electric RVs.
- $65 billion for broadband internet access. This is targeted for rural areas, low-income families and tribal communities through state grants. But any access improvements will likely trickle down to campgrounds and parks.
- $65 billion to modernize the electric grid. Any RVer should welcome an electric grid upgrade to prevent widespread outages.
- $25 billion for airports. For improved runways, gates and taxiways.
- $55 billion for drinking water safety. Again, clean water is something everyone should have easy access to.
Why it should matter to RVers
Infrastructure is one of those things that nobody notices when things are working well. Good roads and bridges keep the delivery trucks (and RVs) rolling smoothly.
When things are falling apart or road systems and bridges don’t keep pace with demand, you get what we are living with now: long delays for a patchwork of minimal road repairs, decaying and dangerous bridges, and overpasses that “just miss” being high enough for your RV air conditioner units.
It’s not just about a smoother ride for your Winnebago. Think about the vast network of delivery trucks needed to keep the currently crippled supply chains moving for parts for new RVs and replacement pieces. When things take longer due to poor road conditions, costs go up.
The White House is projecting that the bill will add at least 2 million new jobs over the next decade.
Paying for it all
President Biden has vowed that nobody earning less than $400,000 will notice a hit on their tax bill. The money is slated to come from $210 billion in unspent COVID-19 relief aid and $53 billion in additional unemployment insurance aid that some states have halted.
The bottom line is that the infrastructure bill is a very big deal for all Americans. It’s going to impact the way we travel as well as the overall quality of our lives. It deserves our full attention.
##RVT1013b
One problem is the government keeps borrowing from one fund to pay for another fund. Some roads I have towed on , I drove on the shoulder as it was smoother than the road. As one old guy told me “he drives in the ruts to avoid the potholes”.
If it were merely an “infrastructure bill”, the only issue I might have is that there’s no money to pay for it. But it isn’t merely an “infrastructure bill”, it’s a pork-laden monstrosity full of social engineering, “woke” dogma, “green new deal” nonsense, and assorted examples of federal largesse and overreach that have nothing at all to do with infrastructure.
In other words, it didn’t take long to get back to “politics as usual”.
Could not have said it better myself. The article above identifies $432.5 billion in infrastructure spending. So what is the other $1.1 trillion in the “infrastructure” bill going to be spent on?
CLeeNick you hit the nail on the head!
They have been pouring mega-bucks into “infrastructure upgrading” for decades, yet no money seems to hit the ground. Highways have been deteriorating all along while tax money ‘earmarked’ for repairs just doesn’t seem to make it to the pavement. Nothing new here. All talk and no action. Yes, there is construction going on, but it seems to be neverending, meaning it looks good but it never gets completed. Construction sites with no one around, yet there are pot holed ‘detours’ around these sites beating your RV to death . . .
It’s good to set at least two people see it for what it is. I’m all for fixing outdated infrastructure, but when the definition is changed to include things that aren’t truly infrastructure, I have a problem with it. Good attempt by the author to sell a bad bill.
Rick I agree 100%!
Me too.
Yup.
I hear dat. Like everything else that our revered elected officials push through congress, and then the White House, it’s pork first. Then attach something warm and fuzzy to it so us lemmings will follow it to the sea. There is no excuse for the need for this much road repair. Many, many years ago all of the federal gasoline and diesel taxes went into the Highway Trust Fund for the sole purpose of building and maintaining highways. The American Trucking Associations fought long and hard to protect that, but finally lost and that money went into the general slush fund. To make it worse, all of our federal spending is now done with money that doesn’t even exist. If anyone tried to run their homes or businesses like this, they would fail big time.
Right on!
AMTRAK, a massive suck of taxpayer money. Other than the North East area, it is a monster money loser. Every seat is heavily subsidized, even Joe Biden’s ride in from De.
I’m sorry folks, but infrastructure spending can’t come soon enough for me. We have driven roads in 14 states since March, been in countless campgrounds, towns and cities where the cell/internet is so congested it is nonexistent and have been thru multi-day power outages. We need to invest in our own country to move us forward.
The freeways have gotten so bad I’ve learned to drive on the white line.
H.R. 227 is tied to another bill that will cost taxpayers billions of dollars and forever change the country. One cannot pass without the other.
Both should be defeated by congress and a new stand-alone bill should be put forth that is a true infrastructure bill. Not pork spending on wish lists.
As far as highway funds go, the highway fuel taxes would pay to maintain the roads if politicians didn’t skim off funds for mass transit, parks, etc. for the cities where most of the voters live. They love to subsidize mass transit so the voters who use it can ride from the south side of Chicago to the north side and back using one fare and transfers rather than make them pay the actual cost of their half day trip.
Paying for it all. With fuel prices up $1.00 to $1.25/gallon in the past 8 months, let “them” help pay for the infrastructure. As a share holder of a few oil stocks, we sure aren’t seeing stocks up or dividends. Someone’s making money.
America needs this bill and as far as the cost, it is NOT anywhere near what the prior president and the GOP gave away in the tax cut to business and the rich.
What? Where is my check? Why should I pay for other peoples transportation, let them pay in the form of increased ticket prices.
Right on, Ron! We are in dire need of improvements and the note about China above is extremely true. They are quickly becoming the world force now, while our eyes stay sleepy. Who is supplying South America, right below us, with money and vaccines – China. They are playing the long game while we quibble.
Then you see comments above from people calling out the 400k being a household vs. individual. Gosh, I’m sure 97% of American feels for you.
This does seem to be an article written to help the reader think all is well with infrastructure improvements as written. However, from where I sit it won’t be enough money to see a project finished. The vast majority of the age appropriate able bodied work force don’t want to work anyway. No well written article is going to make Joe Schmo get out of bed and go to work. Maybe our legislators should have added more pork to that infrastructure bill! It takes a lot of bacon to subsidize a nation and keep government officials and employees in the style to which they have become accustomed.
I’ll believe it when I see it! We’ve been lied to so many times about fixing roads and drainage. You actually think the monies are going to be used for road and such? RIGHT!
The last 4 years included.
Alot of people don’t see or know that alot of, ‘favor’ Bill’s and ‘Pork’ Bills and ‘Turkey’ Projects are tucked into these Bills. When it gets to the vote and loses, the public doesn’t see the real reasons the Blll failed. It just looks like they don’t want roads repaired. They should only allow the bill for what it was written for. None of these hidden agendas!
I hope the Bill’s allow for improvement of all our parks also.
The money always gets diverted to politicos pet projects. Here in Seattle they are spending BILLIONS on a massive light rail project that will be used by a very small percentage of the population. And the agency in charge is one of the most corrupt ever. Massive salaries for management and the “workers” know they are on the gravy train.
Just one case, a group of hard hat workers spent the afternoon at a golf driving range while on the clock. They wrapped up the excursion just in time to go back and punch out…
Another example: 20-30 years ago they planted trees along the freeway with our money. That was all well and good. Now they are cutting them down to make room for the light rail.
We did the light rail thing here to in Cincinnati. It’s such a failure that now they don’t charge people to ride it and still can’t get people to ride it.
Three of my local democratic politicians were in the paper happier than a pig in crap the bill passed. That told me there is a lot of pork in the bill. Last week I watched PennDot taring cracks in a road. One guy was spraying the tar in the cracks. Four were walking with him doing nothing. One guy was following with a truck in the rear with the flashers on and one guy was in the front truck pulling the tar kettle. Well at least they come to work.
Congrats for this “lipstick on a pig” piece. I actually entertained expending the effort required to counter the abject lunacy spewed in this article. The suggestion that Americans will see any semblance of infrastructure improvements from the “monetary rape” being foisted on Americans is ridiculous on its face,defies history, and confirms we have an epidemic of short-term memory loss. Does the term “shovel ready jobs” even ring a bell in the author’s cranium?
No, this is another installment of unicorn chasing pablum for the masses. Electric charging stations? Did the rest of us miss the groundswell of demand for electric cars and RV’s puttering through campgrounds at taxpayer expense? I don’t think you recognize “bread and circus” rhetoric when you see it or perhaps you missed the numerous references to “equity”as used in this and other Progressive boondoggle legislation. Repaired roads, bridges, airports and seaports? This is payoff to Teacher Unions and Progressive NGO’s.
Excellent response. I’d hit the “like” button but this website took that away.
Thank you for the kind words.
I typically blow this stuff off. But this article was more of an insult to one’s intelligence than informative reading. Sounded to me like it was straight out of some Dem’s lobbying playbook or perhaps a “Gender Studies” major at Wellesley.
“like”…..excellent post
Per mile tax coming??!!! I thought I heard a Federal per mile tax was coming in this or another bill soon?
There is a “pilot program” to do this included in the bill. Pilot program is just a government trick to slowly sneak things onto the people.
I would like to know why the US Tax Payer should be spending our taxes money for the development and purchase of Charging Stations for electric vehicles. When the automobile was first introduced to the masses in the prior century, did the federal government develop a network of gas stations across the nation to support them? No of course not. Private corporations built, and developed their own system and made a profit from them. So why now spending our taxes on something that private enterprise can do better and cheaper than the federal government can. Just more pork in the federal system.
Absolutely, if it (charging stations) isn’t good enough for use to make it profitable, it probably isn’t actually feasible.
WOW! Let’s see – Mr. Biden is going to use 263 BILLION of unspent COVID-19 funding to pay part of this bill and has avowed no couple under $400,000 will be taxed more. Well, who is going to pay for the 263 BILLION? Is that from the petty cash drawer? Also Mr. Biden said he is going to tax the corporations – corporations don’t pay tax – they collect it from customers then give it to the government in the form of a so called “corporate tax” – so, ultimately, we pay it – just like tax on tires and jewelry etc. etc. – called “excise Tax”!
States collect gas tax; the federal government collects gas/fuel tax – it used to go to the hiway fund. Truckers pay heavy road taxes in addition to fuel taxes. States in the northern climes have very limited time to build-re-build hiways and bridges and now, to make it even worse, they can’t even get people to work !
Good points conveniently left out by the author as if fiscal malfeasance around infrastructure spending never happened in the very recent past.
The next bill in line will really make this author gush how lucky we all are.
After this article, I’m done with your site.
After these comments, I’m done with comments. Too much negativity. Too much politics.
Oh Grow Up!
It’s time you understand that neither you nor I, or anyone else for that matter, have the luxury of eliminating “politics”. Politics is like gravity; it is inescapable and impacts everyone and every object on the planet. Unfortunately, some it will inevitably be negative. If your primary emphasis is the reduction of negativity in simple commentary and if your primary response is to run away; let me suggest your future will be unsettling indeed. IMO.
Too many angry people who don’t know what they’re talking about. But thanks for your vision of my future. I think I express the feelings of the poster who are getting tired of politics on an RV newsletter. If I want politics I’ll go to facebook.
Not angry, just grounded. Not fearful but aware.
Not emotional but as steady as is reasonably possible.
Not rigid or dogmatic, just don’t suffer fools well.
You are absolutely correct when you say there are “too many people who don’t know what they are talking about.”
LOVE IT!! Facebook is surely the MOST political of the “social media” groups! Please don’t let these negative people chase you away from a GREAT set of RV newsletters!
Great!
Remember “shovel ready jobs”? Brought to you by the same group bringing us an “infrastructure” bill of which only 23% is truly infrastructure.
23% more than anything the last guy did
In a very short time we will probably see a per mileage tax. I wonder if the author of this article will have the same feelings? The federal, state and to some degree local governments have built them self’s into a corner by pushing hybrid, total electric and high fuel mileage vehicles. Now that we have more and more of these on the road the fuel tax is not coming into the governments coffers to cover road repairs. Don’t get me wrong all of these vehicles are good for the environment to some degree however sometimes we trade one pollution for another. I live in Pennsylvania that has the highest state gas tax In the country (Penna is thinking of a per mileage tax). If you ask me if our roads are any better than states with lower tax, I would say “not really that much better”, it seems that a good majority of our fuel tax goes to something else than the roads. Will this happen with the federal government if they slap a per mileage tax on us? I’ll let you decide that for yourself!
Great post.
If you believe, with a Dem majority, the average Joe will not see a tax bill hit, I have a bridge I will sell you.
People should pay taxes. You expect something for nothing? The previous guy’s tax cuts were unnecessary and a political stunt.
they sure helped the rich
I don’t know if you are male or female (CHRIS could be either) but this old lady certainly agrees with you!
male
Oh and the reason the Fed Gov is doing this is the framers made a mistake and left “for the general welfare” in the constitution. They meant for the Fed gov to not grow to the fat wasteful hog it is now. I believe the states could better determine and administer their infrastructure improvements. Projects that benefit people nationally could be funded by groups of cooperating states.
The intent of the article wasn’t to endorse or condemn this particular infrastructure bill. It was to lay out the facts as best we could, and emphasize the need for every American to become familiar with all aspects of the spending bill. Do I have opinions on it? Sure. Obviously the nation’s infrastructure is in need of a remake. Is this the best way to get it done? I’m not sure yet. But I’m going to ensure I know the details as well as possible. The fact is that the infrastructure spending bill exists and is currently working its way to passage. If you like it – or if you don’t – now’s the time to exercise your right to write your Congresspersons and be sure they know how you feel.
Mike, thanks for the info. Keep writing in spite of almost everyone else within this post.
KellyR, you are correct!
Thanks for the information. But, as usual, it’s being torn to pieces by the anti-everything, kill-the-messenger crowd. That said, perhaps it’s time to rethink publishing articles that have the potential to become political firestorms – considering who the president is (really is) and who the majority of the clientele here are.
NRA and GOP you think, maybe?? Don’t lump ME in with THEM, please!
I won’t, and I see it’s gotten worse overnight.
I don’t think you need to be concerned. There is an IQ threshold.
The “know it alls” in the crowd will fly off the handle at the slightest little thing we write that they happen to disagree with it. It’s very sad. — Chuck W./publisher
1st – From what I have read only ~12% of the bill covers actual infrastructure. The rest is a dog’s dinner of social programs and wild pork belly projects. But leaving that portion to other political discussions – lets talk about infrastructure –
1> Everyone agrees that our road system needs to be improved and maintained. But that need has never gone away, and it has always been taxpayer funded. Fuel prices nationwide include federal and State taxes which were supposed to fund road systems. BUT many of those funds have been diverted into other political pet projects. So to a large extent the $$ is being collected – but not applied.
continued . . .
continuing –
2> What concerns me as a full time RVer are proposed mileage charges and vehicle tracking, additional fuel taxes and even possible Carbon taxes. Also concerned about government technology mandates on what types of vehicles can be sold (EVs). While automotive EVs are currently impractical and unaffordable for many current drivers, there appear to even deeper pushes into technologies which really do not exist – such as EV semi-trucks. Or even charging stations which can support their size or huge electrical requirements.
Consumers have always been very good at choosing the best product options for their needs and lifestyle. We do not need government mandating these choices so it should get out of the way and let the free market work to develop practical, affordable and workable transportation innovations which work best for consumers – as they usually have.
Amen!
Green EV’s!
The very definition of an oxymoron.
I just drove 900 miles and burned so much fossil fuel I was proud on how much energy is stored in good old gasoline. Electric vehicles are a joke. Stop with all the nonsense talk.
Ahhh. gasoline engines are 30 to 35% efficient
A rather general statement I must say. “Efficient” at what? Context please.
Boom. There it is. We cannot believe the nonsensical b.s. that suddenly the federal government is actually going to deliver on a promise. This bill has more pork than a case of spam. Most of the money will be diverted and/or wasted with little benefit to the taxpayers.
I wonder if we could spend eighty and ninety percent of our GNP on infrastructure if we weren’t spending billions to trillions of dollars a year supporting other countries and illegal aliens in this country. I’m just saying we have the money for it the government, not the majority of the people, just choosses to spend it in other places. And if you don’t think this is going to up your taxes, you only need to look at past spending bills and cost of living and tax increases in the past.
We can wait for a bill that’s not full of pork and overreach. There is minimal infrastructure in this bill.
No one read it, full of pork products, most of it will be completely wasted just like the last “infrastructure” bill. Don’t be fooled, again.
So where does the remaining 117.5 billion dollars go? Or do these numbers add to 550 if you use government math?
I agree. He seems to have no idea the reality of this spending. This is more about ‘green new energy’ than repairing our current system. As for improving the electrical grid – it does nothing to upgrade it to make it less vulnerable to hackers.
Mike, I think you opened a can of worms you didn’t realize was a can of worms! I THINK I understand what you were trying to say in this article (and I agree) – WE ALL NEED TO BE AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN OUR GOVERNMENT, period!
Mike tried to present what the infrastructure bill is intended to do. The response has largely been political axe-grinding that has almost nothing to do with the article, or the bill’s intended outcome. Reading the angry responses demonstrates how badly our country has been divided, and it has been deliberately divided.
This is being done domestically, for purposes of political gain, and by foreign actors, to weaken us.
Open your eyes. This bill has little to do with infrastructure. It’s all about the “green new deal” and other pork. Too many people believe what they wish to be true rather than the facts.
Nope, wrong. You’re regurgitating talk-show cliches and soundbites.
Yup! Exactly right, Eric. Very well put.
You forgot to mention the Vehicle Milage Tax Plan, subsidies to electric car manufactures (I am sure GM needs more), climate change mitigation, new tunnel for New York (that they can’t get local support to fund themselves or a tunnel to no where) more money for NY rail transportation (on top of that they just received) crash protection for animals what ever that is, breathalyzer testing built into your vehicle starting system (great additional cost for our RV,s. It also includes hidden taxes that have the greatest cost to middle and lower income people. When I first heard the bill it sounded great. Buried in it’s more than 2000 pages is a lot of pork. I like my pork smoked or grilled, not shoved down my throat. I I guess this bill is another Pelosi “we have to pass it to see what is in it” way to fund the green new deal.
This Pork Pie bill is nothing more than a boom to the handful of democrat stronghold cities in the U.S., along with payback for swinging the past election in the “D” direction.
Anybody the lives outside of large urban areas, aka city dwellers, will pay dearly with the tax and spend approach being taken.
Even the article within this newsletter sings the chimes of the party like a high school cheerleader with statements like some of the “new” spending will be offset by leftover Covid monies not spent. Well, where the heck does that money come from?
Already virtually every citizen of this country, and hey even the illegal residents, are feeling the economic impact in our wallets created by Washington leadership with fuel prices at or above a dollar a gallon more than last year, run away food costs, shortages of workers because Uncle Sam will pay you more to sit on your arse at home, travel, lodging and on and on and on.
I hope those that brought in this bag of jerks are happy.
Interesting the comments. Rather than discussing the bills intent and what’s actually in it, most devolve into repeating their “news commentary” political slogans, cliches and soundbites to fit their leanings.
Welcome to this years class expert graduates from the University of the Internet.
It’s mostly shoot-the-messenger diatribe with misused words. Chuck expressed his opinion on these keyboard warriors below.