Clean energy production will require loss of thousands of Joshua trees

One hundred years. That’s how long many of California’s Joshua trees have successfully battled against disease, insects, weather, and human encroachment. Now, that battle is coming to an end.

A 2,300-acre project by Avantus is slated to cut down thousands of Joshua trees on privately owned land in Kern County, California, so that solar panels can be installed in their place to generate electricity for about 180,000 homes.

There are about 4,700 Joshua trees on the site, and about 500 of those trees stand at least 16 feet tall. The company plans to cut down about 3,500 of them.

A statement on their website reads: “Avantus is working to preserve native Mojave plants like Joshua Trees while also preserving California’s ability to achieve its clean energy goals – and the economic and climate benefits that come with them. While trees will be impacted during project construction, vastly more Joshua Trees are being threatened by climate change caused by rising greenhouse gas emissions, which the Aratina solar project directly addresses.”

In 2023, California lawmakers passed the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act, which prohibits the killing of these trees without a permit. However, the Aratina project received state approval prior to both the enactment of the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act and the designation of the Joshua tree as a candidate for protection under the state’s Endangered Species Act.

The project has residents in the affected Boron and Desert Lake communities upset. Along with disgust about the destruction of Joshua trees, residents worry about the predictable dust and noise generated by the massive project, as well as the habitat destruction of the desert tortoise, an endangered species.

Folks upset by the project wonder about the head-scratching decision to clear this section of the Mojave Desert environment in order to save the environment with solar energy.

Related:

##RVT1160b

Gail Marsh
Gail Marsh
Gail Marsh is an avid RVer and occasional work camper. Retired from 30+ years in the field of education as an author and educator, she now enjoys sharing tips and tricks that make RVing easier and more enjoyable.

Sign up for America's favorite RVing newsletter

The FREE RVtravel.com newsletter is filled with great RV information, advice, and news written by RV experts, delivered right to your inbox. Never any SPAM and we will NEVER sell your information! When you subscribe, you'll get three checklists that every RVer should have as a thank you!

Our most popular articles this week:


SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR RV?
Good news! We have more than 3,500 articles in our “RV Maintenance and Repair” category, so we’re confident we can help you solve the problem. In addition, did you know you can search our website using the search bar at the top of every page for keywords or topics that interest you or that you need help with? Yep, we’ve got you covered!


Everything on sale for RVers right now. Yes, right now! Click here.

A Permanent Address for RV Freedom — Full-time RVers trust America’s Mailbox for mail forwarding, residency help, and reliable support from the road.

Comments

Please follow our rules for commenting.

25 Comments

Scott B
2 years ago

Be green unless it is inconvenient…

sounds a lot like the celebs who preach to the unwashed masses about carbon footprints and then fly off in their private jets.

HMMM, did the planners of this solar farm run out of desert acreage that doesn’t have these endangered trees currently occupying the area? There is so little scrub desert real estate available in the south west.

Gordon den Otter
2 years ago

Interesting to see environmentalists having to wrestle with trade-offs. It’s much easier when you only have to criticize the other guys. Now when you have to make a real choice, you see how hard it can be.

Bill Byerly
2 years ago

Who are the F-ing idiots who are allowing this to move forward ??

Last edited 2 years ago by Bill Byerly
Admin
Noble Member
Diane McGovern
2 years ago
Reply to  Bill Byerly

Don’t hold back, Bill. (Sorry.) I’ve just added a link at the bottom of the post for the Aratina website’s answers to FAQs. Yeah, I don’t like this either. Have a good afternoon/evening. 🙂 –Diane

Bill Byerly
2 years ago
Reply to  Diane McGovern

I’ll check it out, thanks 👍

Admin
Noble Member
Diane McGovern
2 years ago
Reply to  Bill Byerly

You’re welcome, Bill. (It answers a lot of questions, but I still don’t like it. Just sayin’.☹️) Have a good night. 😀 –Diane

Bill Byerly
2 years ago
Reply to  Diane McGovern

Checked it out and there’s still more questions than answers.
I don’t want to get into the politics of this decision here though. I get myself in enough trouble with my opinions as it is sometimes…🤔 🫢 🫣

Admin
Noble Member
Diane McGovern
2 years ago
Reply to  Bill Byerly

Well, of course there are more questions than answers, Bill. Isn’t that how everything works (or doesn’t work) these days?🙄 Take care. 😀 –Diane

Bill Byerly
2 years ago
Reply to  Diane McGovern

It’s definitely a political decision, worth more discussion. Might make for a good reader’s poll question..

Admin
Noble Member
Diane McGovern
1 year ago
Reply to  Bill Byerly

Yeah, and you know how we love to get into political “discussions” here, Bill. I doubt that the powers that be would want to run that topic as a poll question, but thank you for the suggestion.👍 Have a great day. 😀 –Diane

Drew
2 years ago

This is distressing. I wish they had another site.

HOWARD SCHILLER
2 years ago

This is happening throughout the Mojave desert. The Antelope Valley has seen these solar farms come in and bulldoze acres of Joshua trees. They also bulldoze the California Poppies. And we have a endangered broughing owl that nest underground that gets killed as well. There’s almost nowhere they can build these solar farms that won’t damage some part of the ecosystem.

Neal Davis
2 years ago

Thank you, Gail! 🙂 Interesting development, huh? Funny how life can be so messy. How can environmentalists be on both sides of this deal? Some for solar to address global warming and some for trees and turtles. How will this play out? Thanks for the notification, Gail! 🙂 Have a great week and safe travels! 🙂

MattD
1 year ago
Reply to  Neal Davis

Neal, you’re too nice a guy to slam for your ‘global warming’ comment…

Neal Davis
1 year ago
Reply to  MattD

Thanks, Matt! 🙂 As to global warming, well, that is an environmentalist’s issue and I don’t think of myself as one. Have a great weekend and safe travels! 🙂

Nick
1 year ago

Thanks for the info Gail! Isn’t ironic that we have to destroy the planet to save it! Lol.

Chris
1 year ago

They (environmentalist) don’t care about the millions of acres of land all over the world being lost to dig minerals to make batteries, not to mention the slave child labor. Why should they care about some trees. It’s all about money and most importantly, power.

Dave
1 year ago

So many thoughts.
1 – it’s private land. They should have rights on it.
2 – nuclear is the best bang for the buck & clean energy. Why are we not investing a ton here? This would help prevent this & reduce the need for fossil fuels.
3 – the same people that dislike this often love fossil. It’s just hate on change. We built a pipeline near me that had way more environmental damage.
#gonuclear

Larry Lagerberg
1 year ago
Reply to  Dave

So true Dave. The fear of nuclear is largely based on events that happened 40-50 years ago. The technology now is lights years better in terms of safety and yet it is virtually off the table in terms of new energy builds.

Dave Easley
1 year ago
Reply to  Dave

Correct, it’s private land. If you don’t like what the owner is going to do with their private land, get a group together to pool funds and buy the land. Then you can enjoy your investment in desert land by watching the trees.

GrumpyVet
1 year ago

Poses an interesting dilemma for the “environmentalists”, huh? I wonder if there is widespread wailing, hair pulling, and gnashing of teeth in that community?

Captain Gort
1 year ago

Not to mention the VISUAL DESTRUCTION of that beautiful area

John the road again
1 year ago

In 20 years or so, we’ll need another trillion-dollar superfund program to clear the landscape of these things.

Lawrence Neely
1 year ago

more like 8 years

Robin P
1 year ago

180,000 homes, hmmmm hey how about putting solar systems on those homes instead of destroying an ecosystem for profit, oh wait, profit the key to this all!